?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

MOO has teh funneh!

Got funny cat picture? Check. Got the right font? Check. Got funny caption? Meh... No. Harder than it looks, isn't it? Never mind. Lolcats are here, and they totally haz a flavor! Get Ready Made Greeting Cards or Postcards or mix it up and choose 'em yourself, in the mixy-uppy section.


How d'you feel now, Lolcat fans?


Yeh. We like 'em.

You know what else?

But enough about me.

There's more. We've also got these brilliant cards by Someecards. You might have to send them with extreme caution (there's a bit of swearing) and both the Seasonal Greeting Cards and the Postcards are drier than you could ever imagine. But hey - your friends have the same sense of humour as you right? That's why you get on?

Well... that's why you used to get on :)
Go on! Send one - you know you want to.

Comments

( 26 comments — Leave a comment )
tgies
16th Dec, 2007 22:52 (UTC)
raise your hand if you're sick of this lolcat dreck
snobahr
16th Dec, 2007 23:10 (UTC)
(keeps hands quite down)
psychokitten76
17th Dec, 2007 02:50 (UTC)
me too
teostra
16th Dec, 2007 23:21 (UTC)
tgies
16th Dec, 2007 23:27 (UTC)
in retrospect i should have seen this coming
uchuufuku
17th Dec, 2007 03:30 (UTC)
Hand raised :(

I'm starting to get the same feeling when I see these cats as when someone writes "teh funnies" or "omg!!!1one" and so on, which is really unpleasant.
syntheticjesso
17th Dec, 2007 03:33 (UTC)
I sometimes feel like I should be tired of them, but I still laugh every dang time. They amuse me.
natf
17th Dec, 2007 06:17 (UTC)
*hands well and truly down*

If you are, just don't buy them!
textualdeviance
16th Dec, 2007 23:18 (UTC)
I hate to be a downer, but has this all been cleared for copyright issues? I suspect most of the owners of these pics or the text on them might not be too worried about them being posted on ICHC, but selling merchandise with their work on them without a contract could be legally problematic. Might want to double-check on these. I'd hate to see either ICHC or Moo get sued over one of these.
tgies
16th Dec, 2007 23:27 (UTC)
that would be hilarious though
the_wondering_1
16th Dec, 2007 23:37 (UTC)
lol it would..
that is a good point, a very good point.
xnera
17th Dec, 2007 02:34 (UTC)
This was my exact thought as well.
psychokitten76
17th Dec, 2007 02:48 (UTC)
TOS at ICHC states:

For clarity, you retain all of your ownership rights in your User Submissions. However, by submitting User Submissions to Pet Holdings, you hereby grant Pet Holdings a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the User Submissions, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the Website (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels. You also hereby grant each user of the Website a non-exclusive license to access your User Submissions through the Website, and to use, reproduce, distribute, display and perform such User Submissions as permitted through the functionality of the Website and under these Terms of Service.
textualdeviance
17th Dec, 2007 04:22 (UTC)
That only applies to user submissions, though, not older stuff that existed before that agreement. And it also doesn't apply to any photos--like the lolrus ones--that weren't taken by the person who wrote the caption or sent it in. Photographers retain copyright for all their photos unless they specifically waive it.
psychokitten76
17th Dec, 2007 05:16 (UTC)
But don't the TOS also state that you don't send in a photo unless you have taken it and/or have permission to use it? In which case, it would be the sender-inner (lol) who would be breaching copyright?
uchuufuku
17th Dec, 2007 03:28 (UTC)
Could they be considered a derivative work, and then arguably be alright under fair use?
textualdeviance
17th Dec, 2007 03:35 (UTC)
Nope. Fair use is really hard to argue, especially in the case of merchandise.
uchuufuku
17th Dec, 2007 11:58 (UTC)
It is, I was just assuming that Moo would have some legal advice before considering submissions of that sort.

But I did actually misinterpret your original comment, I took it that you were referring only to the original photographs that the images are based on. The risk of someone submitting an image they didn't make would be a different situation and has nothing to do with questions of fair use, of course.
moocards
17th Dec, 2007 12:08 (UTC)
Yes, we did take legal advice. The images are covered under ICHCB terms of service, and our agreement with them. They have assured us that they have the rights to allow us to print the images.
uchuufuku
17th Dec, 2007 14:52 (UTC)
You guys know what you're doing :)
shadeau
17th Dec, 2007 17:38 (UTC)
And what about the fact that most of these are likely stolen from places like 4chan?
cherryvega
17th Dec, 2007 06:11 (UTC)
derivative works are only okay under certain Creative Commons licenses, not under regular copyright.
uchuufuku
17th Dec, 2007 11:49 (UTC)
I don't think that's quite the case, but certainly without a CC license the process of legally establishing fair use is a notoriously muddy area.
amethest
17th Dec, 2007 09:45 (UTC)
All I know is the "It's beautiful" would have been funnier as, "My God it's full of stars!"
opiate1138
17th Dec, 2007 13:57 (UTC)
*SNERKS*

Awesome.
sunrising
17th Dec, 2007 15:01 (UTC)
*squeee*

If these had been announced a couple weeks ago I would have ordered some to send out as my Christmas cards. Oh the evil thoughts for next year.

Yes. I know I'm a dork.
( 26 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

September 2010
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner